New York Water Law
Lake and clouds
      Blog Home      Index of Posts      About the NYS DEC      About the DRBC      About the SRBC

June 8, 2016

Closed Cycle Cooling at Athens Requires 1/1,000 of Water Required by Ravenswood to Generate Half the Power

The June 1, 2016 notice that the New Athens Generating Company has applied for a water withdrawal permit for its Athens Generation Station in Athens, New York provides a stunning illustration of the benefits of closed cycle cooling. The notice by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) states that the Athens Generating Station is applying to take "1.5 million gallons of water per day from the Hudson River for the facility's air-cooled condensers."

A comparison of the 1.5 million GPD permit amount requested by Athens with the over 1.5 billion GPD amount permitted to TransCanada's Ravenswood Generating Station in Queens, shows that New Athens is requesting 1/1,000 or 0.001% of the amount of water permitted to TransCanada. See DEC Gives Two Weeks to Comment on First Water Withdrawal Application for 1.5 Billion GPD. Yet the generating capacity of the Athens station is almost half that of Ravenswood. According to Wikipedia, the generating capacity of the Athens station is 1,138 MW and the generating capacity of Ravenswood station is 2,410 MW. This indicates that the Athens plant is 500 times as efficient in its use of cooling water as the Ravenswood plant. For a table of the water usage by New York's largest water users, see Will 12 NY Power Plants Get Permits this Year for 111% of NY's Total Fresh Water Usage?

In the case of both Athens and Ravenswood, the permitted amount is the plant's maximum withdrawal capacity and the plants generally use less water. According to DEC's website on Aquatic Habitat Protection and Cooling Water Impact Mitigation, the Athens station usually withdraws only 180,000 gallons of water per day. As the website states, "The withdrawal of this water results in very little impact on the aquatic organisms of the Hudson River."

The obvious question is why isn't DEC requiring all generating stations in New York to adopt similar cooling technologies?

Posted by Rachel Treichler on 06/08/16, updated 08/16/16.

 

 

Copyright 2016, Rachel Treichler

 

   


About NY Water Law

New York Water Law covers legal developments relating to water usage in New York and in jurisdictions that may be influential in New York. The author, Rachel Treichler, practices law in the Finger Lakes region.
Contact the Author
Law Office of Rachel Treichler

Search NY Water Law

Enter search terms:

Index of Posts

Index of Posts by Month

Water Law Links

Acequias and Adjudication
Aguanomics
American Water Resources
AquaLog
Arizona Waterblogged
Bluedaze Blog
CELP
Circle of Blue
Coyote Gulch
Croton Watershed Coalition
E&E Law Monitor
Elizabeth Royte Notes
ESA Blawg
Great Lakes Law Blog
Great Lakes on the Ground
Green Blawg
International Water Law Blog
Lake Scientist
Lakeside Views
Law of the Land Blog
Legal Planet
Marcellus Effect Blog
NRDC Switchboard
NY Water Resources Institute
Oklahoma Water Law
Ohio Environ. Law Blog
Pace GreenLaw
Rancho Los Malulos
Steven Solomon's Water Blog
SPR Environmental Law Blog
The Reef Tank
Thirsty in Suburbia
NYT Toxic Waters Series
Water Law Blog
Water Sustainability Project
Water Wiki
Watercrunch
Watering the Desert
Watershed Post
WaterWired
WesternWaterBlog

 

[Valid RSS]


















This blog is published for educational purposes only. The matters discussed in the blog are general
in nature and are incomplete descriptions of the law. Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice or an offer of legal advice.
You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem.